For more Transparency in Deliberative Research. Implications for Deliberative Praxis

Abstract

Coding decisions in deliberative research are almost never justified. We show with our own research how transparency in the coding decisions helps deliberate practitioners better to relate to deliberate research and in this way to acquire deliberative skills.

Keywords

website with qualitative data, deliberative praxis, transparency

How to Cite

Mameli S. & Steiner J., (2017) “For more Transparency in Deliberative Research. Implications for Deliberative Praxis”, Journal of Public Deliberation 13(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.288

683

Views

234

Downloads

Share

Authors

Simona Mameli (University Bern)
Jürg Steiner (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Download

Issue

Publication details

Dates

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: c2e2a561c1cdc615759df2742fb00794